Hsu Maurer posted an update 8 months, 2 weeks ago
Let’s consider the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies something that shares idc’s server resources with other users.
Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
The rental type gets the advantage of having a server on idc, so that it does not have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.
However, you must pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn’t just a Webhard, it is a company.
It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the answer alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had an internet site or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work which used to run the site.
OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company’s homepage in addition to the Webhard’s original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the answer.
The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, that can be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.
It is now necessary for Soho to determine a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Internet service that allows one to download files on the internet at a set monthly cost. Therefore the utilization of web hard has become common.
p2p 순위 But it’s not just lately that this concept arrived, and it’s true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, lots of people used it, and there have been many workers in offices who didn’t sign up for it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.
The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a large portal, which also leads to security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it.
In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users’ needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses using the number of users), that is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly reduce the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative because it supports uploading files by default. It’s a really good feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations because the basic webhard included in these NAS is basic. Because the word “basic” implies, it isn’t a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Consequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it is a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very helpful solution that’s significantly less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I’ll check out the rough features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the right one based on the reality and needs.